Saturday, October 24, 2015

My New Webpage

Creating a Website

After long last, and a little reluctance, I finally  created a website for my classes.  I had been considering this medium for a while as a means to connect with the students, but had yet to endeavor such an endeavor.  Alas, as it is 2015, and a jump on the technology train is inevitable,  I embarked on the world wide weebly approach to creating this site.

Within this site are both of my classes, Integrated Math and Video Production, as well as a link to the GSA club, of which I am co-advisor.  So far the Math and GSA pages are still under construction, but the Video Production page is up and running.  Within it are a sampling of videos created by students, as well as resources to provide tips for improving video creation.  In addition, links to articles describing successful High School media programs are also available as inspiration.

I hope that students will peruse the page as a source for honing their skills; or maybe just to revisit some of the exciting moments captured throughout the year as they try to whip up a bit of nostalgia.  Either way, www.mrneumann.net is there to provide some sort of positive reinforcement, if nothing else but for being a student in my class. :)

Sunday, October 18, 2015

Assignment 3B






On Mondays, students are assigned the videos that they will complete during the week.  Following the dissemination of videos, I then speak about the weekly theme.
Monday began composition week, in which the students are to focus on their framing and composition, and overall improve the quality of their finished product.  This lesson is also helpful in allowing students to become more artistic in general, which can increase the consideration and finesse put into each video.
The day began with the typical protocol. Once the bell rang to begin class, we headed over to the ASB to have a "client" meeting.  This is the beginning of the video process, in which the client informs the students which pieces of advertisement are of higher priority, both in content and time frame.  After the ideas were presented, we returned to the classroom where I unleashed the die of fate to cast a merciless sentence unto each group.
The process is as follows: The six video topics are written on the board in any order. A six-sided die is then rolled by a random student, deciding which group will have to make which video.  This process continues down the list, calling its victims, as the die so heartlessly decides the fate of each group.  Some are disappointed in their video selection while others are elated; the gods of fate, reincarnated as a callous green cube, have shaped the tone of their week.  At this point that the trade gates open, allowing for a loosely controlled shouting match, as they try to negotiate a video trade with another group.  End of process.
Once the bickering stopped, I then presented the theme of the week.  However, this time, I created a pre-assessment, as described in Assignment 3A, whereby students were given a slideshow of pictures, followed by a series of questions to answer about each one.  These questions asked them to describe any obvious, or uncomfortable aspects of the composition.  Once they completed the last slide, we engaged in a brief discussion about their opinions of framing and eye movement.  I also used this time to describe the current standards on framing, and the rule of thirds.  After the pre-assessment was collected, I gave them 15 minutes to provide a quick write up of their idea.

After the write-ups, they grabbed their video equipment and headed out to shoot, leaving my classroom mostly empty of students.  (It's like a prep!  Which is nice, ‘cause I teach six classes)  
At this point, production on my part was a little slow, as most of the kids were not around to discuss their projects with me.  It wasn’t until 15 minutes before the end of class that the students started loudly trickling in, at which time a barrage of students rampaged toward me, all exuberantly telling me all about their hilarious shoot.  
Finally, clean up began and the students were dismissed at the sound of the bell.
     Reflection
I had never done a pre-assessment before, and I appreciate the perspective I got from the students, as far as their unfiltered opinions about composition.  I expected that they would be quite inexperienced with composition, and that many of them would have a hard time seeing the difference between the good and the bad.  But I was truly surprised by the number of students, many of whom I did not expect to care, who had a distinct understanding and connection to composition.  They were able to describe aspects of the picture that paralleled the current opinion, though they had never been asked to criticize it in the past.  Some students told me that they naturally took pictures this way, without previously learning about framing technique.  As I watched the discussion, I could see that I was separating out the natural photographers ... it was pretty cool.

Wednesday, October 14, 2015

Pre-Assessment: Composition

Pre-Assessment
Composition


This week’s video theme was composition, so I chose to give a pre-assessment intended to gather opinions from the students about subject placement in the frame, as well as overall enjoyment of particular images.  I projected the photos in front of the class and had them answer the following questions about each one.


  1. What is your initial judgment of the composition of this photo?
  2. What is your eye drawn to? (The answer can be multiple things)
  3. Does anything stand out as uncomfortable in terms of composition?  Why do you feel this way?
  4. Do you have any suggestions for improvement?


Photo #1
        
      
Photo #2                 
  


Photo #3
   

Photo #4
       



Photo #5

Photo #6
        


Photo #7


After the initial assessment, we began a discussion about their opinions, as well as the differences between the well/poorly composed images.  We spoke about the rule of thirds, as well as the purpose of the lines that appear on their phone screen as they take a picture.  
The discussion became very passionate, inciting several disagreements among students.

Findings
The purpose of this pre-assessment was to try and determine if our conventions for composition are ingrained, or simply a learned pattern of thinking.  After reviewing their responses for each photo, I was completely unclear.  Some kids answered the questions with similar alignment to the orthodox, while others gave very vague responses to each question.  


Conventional compositional belief
Most common student opinion.

Photo #1:
  • Terrible picture
  • Too many subjects to focus on
  • The water looks to be coming out of her head.

Photo #1
  • Terrible picture
  • Head too low
  • Water seems to be shooting out of her head.

Photo #2
  • Nice composition
  • Follows the rule of thirds (loosely)
  • Train tracks lead the eye to the subject.

Photo #2
  • Nice composition
  • Subject too small
  • Eye follows the tracks.

Photo #3
  • Too dark
  • No specific subject
  • Nothing stands out.

Photo #3
  • Too dark
  • Boring
  • Can’t tell what you’re supposed to look at

Photo #4
  • Nice composition
  • Subject is in the correct part of the frame to compensate for look room
  • Follows the rule of thirds
  • Leaves allow the eye to travel around the frame and back to the subject

Photo #4
  • OK composition
  • Subject is off center
  • Leaves are distracting
  • Lighting is nice

Photo #5
  • Poor composition
  • Subject is in the center of the frame, does not follow the rule of thirds
  • No head room
  • Boring background

Photo #5
  • Good placement of subject in the center
  • Not enough head room
  • Boring background

Photo #6
  • Good composition
  • Subject placement follows the rule of thirds
  • Orientation of object draws the eye to the stem of the acorn
  • Nice depth of field

Photo #6
  • Good composition
  • Interesting background
  • Composition draws the eye to the acorn

Photo #7
  • Poor composition
  • The sun is technically in the correct part of the frame, but...
  • There is nothing particularly interesting about this picture, no clouds, nothing in the water, etc.
  • Too much empty space above the sun

Photo #7
  • Good composition
  • Nice picture


Reflection
I was surprised at the students’ responses, and how little they cared about subject placement.  In fact, many of them preferred the placement of the businessman in Photo #5 than the young girl in Photo #4, whereas I would have expressed the opposite opinion.  We began talking about selfies and angle preference and composition.  Many of them preferred a high angle of shooting with a centered subject matter, as opposed to the conventional chest-height off-center subject placement.
I was not as surprised at how they felt about Photo #7, even though their opinions contradicted compositional standards.  This shot is seen quite often when people try and take picture of the sunset; they frequently mistake cool subject matter for good composition.  In this case, since the sunset is often a striking subject, people tend to feel that all sunset pictures are inherently good ones.  The kids felt the same way; sunsets are beautiful in real life, so pictures of them will also be beautiful.  Fortunately this isn’t true, otherwise no one would travel!
I quite enjoyed this activity, as I had never given a pre-assessment in Video Production before.  It was interesting to try and discern which “photographic standards” are built in to our natural appreciation for visual balance, and which are simply adopted.  Strangely, after discussing the norms of composition with the kids, many immediately changed their opinions of some of photos.  When I described eye movement, they began to appreciate Photo #4, as well as understand the problems with Photo #7.

Next time I’d like to include video clips, to show composition and camera movement.  I also might ask them to go out and take “good” pictures, to see how they would frame a shot before learning the norms.  Nevertheless, the activity resonated with both students and teacher, hopefully giving some insight to both.

Tuesday, October 6, 2015

Assignment 1A

Hi!  My name is Mike Neumann, I am currently a teacher at San Ysidro High School; I teach Algebra and Video Production.
I never actually thought I would become a teacher; and though it was on my list of interesting careers, it seemed more like a fall-back than anything else.  I finished college with the dream of becoming a professional film editor, but after slaving away for free, editing terrible documentaries in people's basements, I realized that I didn't carry the passion I needed to continue with this profession.  I wanted to do something in which I could make a direct personal impact on people, and alas, imaginings of helping kids improve their future began materializing in my jaded mind.  As non-illustrious as many might believe teaching to be, as compared to the film industry anyway, I still continue to wake up content with my career decision.  Here I am on Fall break, with another week until school resumes...and I already miss my students.  Call me crazy or call me a teacher.
My personality, according to many of these tests, rides on my emotional state and energy.  And according to my results ion the MMDI, I embrace change, and approach it with a tinge of excitement to ride it and share my discoveries.  I think that this, subconsciously, is what drew me to the teaching profession, and ultimately to the subject of math.  I still like to think that I teach in a way that enlightens kids to embrace math with less prejudice, and elicit a sense of comfort with the subject, as most cringe at the though of numbers.  But of course, with all of this excitement comes extra work, and though I'm not at the level I'd like to be in teaching, my passion for change inspires me to continue growing.
It wasn't until a couple of years later that I took on the role of Video Production teacher, for which I'm taking this course.  I thought it would be a fun class to teach, and allow kids to broadcast their personalities.  With such a medium to present their work, students could feel like local superstars, improving their creative skills as well as their self confidence.
According to the test, my emotions govern my actions, which can be both a blessing and a curse.  I'm generally a positive person, and in the teaching profession, this is seen through colorful decorations and exaggerated exuberance during lectures.  I like to believe that this lures the students into entering my silly world and disarms me, in a way, to allow me to be approachable.  Of course this sometimes works against me, as it is hard to discipline students with authority when you're the goofy teacher on campus.  In the end, I develop a very close relationship with my kids, allowing them to open up and shed some light on their fears of school, in hopes that I can convince them of the positive effects of scholastic success